Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 1290 vs AMD EPYC 9015

Intel Xeon W 1290 vs AMD EPYC 9015

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 1290 with 10 cores 3.2GHz and AMD EPYC 9015 with 8 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 1290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 125W)
AMD EPYC 9015 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 2933)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 20MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2020
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 1200
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Comet Lake)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

-
Transistor Count
16.63 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
80 W
Power Consumption
125 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
206 mm²
Die Size
2x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
8
-
Performance Core Threads
16
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
10
Total Core Count
8
20
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.0
Multiplier
36.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
20 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
2
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
3
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy