Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 1290 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P

Intel Xeon W 1290 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 1290 with 10 cores 3.2GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 1290 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (80W vs 180W)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 20MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2020
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 1200
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Comet Lake)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

-
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
80 W
Power Consumption
180 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
206 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
10
Total Core Count
32
20
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.0
Multiplier
26.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
20 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy