Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3335 vs AMD EPYC 9384X

Intel Xeon W 3335 vs AMD EPYC 9384X

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
1351
AMD EPYC 9384X +60%
2169
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
10557
AMD EPYC 9384X +63%
17274
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Jun 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
250 W
Power Consumption
320 W
78 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
16
Total Core Count
32
32
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
25.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy