Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC 7343

Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC 7343

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz and AMD EPYC 7343 with 16 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 7343 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.7GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 48MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (190W vs 270W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3365 +87%
1902
AMD EPYC 7343
1014
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3365 +611%
18361
AMD EPYC 7343
2582
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Mar 2021
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Milan
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))

Package

-
Transistor Count
16.6 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
190 W
81 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
12 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²

CPU Performance

2.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
32
Total Core Count
16
64
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
32.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
48 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
Cores per CCD
4
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
8
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
4
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy