Intel Xeon X5698 vs AMD EPYC 9384X
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon X5698 with 2 cores 4.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon X5698 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (4.4GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 32nm)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Westmere-EP
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
Intel Socket 1366
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Westmere-EP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
1.17 billions
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
239 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
4.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
2
Total Core Count
32
4
Total Thread Count
64
133 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
33.0
Multiplier
25.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
3
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
2
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128
