Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs FirePro M3900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+955%
2534
FirePro M3900
240
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Oct 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.37 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
