Home Comparison Opteron 4386 vs AMD EPYC 9015

Opteron 4386 vs AMD EPYC 9015

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 4386 with 8 cores 3.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9015 with 8 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 4386 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 125W)
AMD EPYC 9015 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 32nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Seoul
Core Architecture
Turin
AMD Socket C32
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Seoul)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

1.2 billions
Transistor Count
16.63 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
125 W
-
Foundry
TSMC
315 mm²
Die Size
2x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
8
-
Performance Core Threads
16
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
8
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.5
Multiplier
36.0
384 K
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
8 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy