Home Comparison Opteron 4386 vs AMD EPYC 9275F

Opteron 4386 vs AMD EPYC 9275F

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 4386 with 8 cores 3.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9275F with 24 cores 4.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 4386 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9275F 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.1GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 32nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Seoul
Core Architecture
Turin
AMD Socket C32
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Seoul)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

1.2 billions
Transistor Count
66.52 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
320 W
-
Foundry
TSMC
315 mm²
Die Size
8x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
24
-
Performance Core Threads
48
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
8
Total Core Count
24
8
Total Thread Count
48
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.5
Multiplier
41.0
384 K
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
8 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy