Quadro FX 1700 vs Tesla PG500 216
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)
Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Tesla PG500 216
+23849%
14130
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
80
32
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GV100
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
