Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro NVS 150M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 150M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 42W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
+180%
59
Quadro NVS 150M
21
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
1
32
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.120 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.120 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
10W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
G98
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
