Quadro FX 360M vs Tesla K40c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 245W)
Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Tesla K40c
+19307%
5046
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2880
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK180
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
