Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro K2100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro K2100M
+66%
768
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
