Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+691%
3656
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
