Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs RTX A4000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
RTX A4000 Mobile
+3622%
17200
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
40
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.4 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.20 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
268.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
115W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA104
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
