Home Comparison Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs RTX A5500 Mobile

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
RTX A5500 Mobile +4720%
22270

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
58
192
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA103
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net