Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Tesla K40c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 245W)
Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Tesla K40c
+992%
5046
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
245W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
