Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 1536GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro 5000M
+12%
518
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
10
192
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
