Quadro K2200 vs Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
+233%
1439
Quadro 3000M
432
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
640
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
