Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro 6000

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +73%
1786
Quadro 6000
1028
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
448
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GF100
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy