Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K4000M

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +54%
1786
Quadro K4000M
1154
Blender
Quadro M2000 +54%
145
Quadro K4000M
94
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000 +40%
28
Quadro K4000M
20
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
960
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy