Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro FX 2700M

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +1306%
1786
Quadro FX 2700M
127
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G94
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy