Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro M5000

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1163MHz vs 1038MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Quadro M5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro M5000 +138%
4252
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro M5000 +128%
332
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro M5000 +210%
87
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GM204
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy