Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1785MHz vs 1163MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro T2000 Mobile +104%
3656
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
TU117
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy