Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs RTX A500 Embedded

Quadro M2000 vs RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1335MHz vs 1163MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A500 Embedded +206%
5468
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA107S
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy