Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro NVS 140M

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro NVS 140M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +6769%
1786
Quadro NVS 140M
26
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G86
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy