Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K80

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K80

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1163MHz vs 824MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Tesla K80 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Tesla K80 +130%
4113
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Tesla K80 +157%
373
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Tesla K80 +121%
62
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
2496
48
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK210
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.7
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy