Quadro NVS 290 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 75W)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+13672%
3994
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
