Quadro NVS 290 vs Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 450W)
Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
14320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+153141%
44440
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
14336
8
TMUs
896
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
100 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
