Home Comparison Quadro P600 vs Tesla K20X

Quadro P600 vs Tesla K20X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 235W)
Tesla K20X 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Tesla K20X +229%
3935

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2688
24
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK110
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net