Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+3297%
16310
Quadro 2000D
480
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
4
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
62W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GF106
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
