Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1770MHz vs 1627MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (60W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+144%
16310
RTX A1000 Embedded
6664
Blender
Quadro RTX 8000
+119%
2844
RTX A1000 Embedded
1297
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
16
4608
Shading Units
2048
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
64
72
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GA107S
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
754 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
