Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus with 10 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 134U with 12 cores 0.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 6400)

Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 0.7GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 12MB)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 7nm)

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U 's Advantages

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 4.0)

Lower TDP (9W vs 23W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus +9%

2347

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

2146

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus +51%

12973

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

8540

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

VS

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

General Parameters

Apr 2024

Release Date

Dec 2023

Qualcomm

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

ARMv9

Instruction Set

-

Snapdragon X

Core Architecture

Meteor Lake

X1P-64-100

Processor Number

-

Custom

Socket

Intel BGA 2551

Qualcomm Adreno X1

Integrated Graphics

Arc Xe-LPG 64EU

Oryon

Generation

Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake)

Package

4 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

23 W

Power Consumption

9 W

80 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Samsung TSMC

Foundry

Intel

mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

10

Performance Cores

2

10

Performance Core Threads

4

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

0.7 GHz

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.4 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

10

-

Efficiency Core Threads

10

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

500 MHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.6 GHz

10

Total Core Count

12

10

Total Thread Count

14

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

34x

Multiplier

7.0

-

L1 Cache

112 KB per core

-

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

42 MB

L3 Cache

12 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5X-8448

Memory Types

LPDDR5-6400

64 GB

Max Memory Size

-

8

Max Memory Channels

2

135 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

500 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1200 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

1536

Shader Units

-

48

Texture Units

-

6

Raster Operation Units

-

6

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

-

3.8 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

Official Website

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

4.0

PCIe Version

4

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX

2

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i7 11370H

3

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i5 9300H

4

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

5

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Celeron N4020

6

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i3 1220P

7

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

8

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i5 11500H

9

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i3 1315U

10

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Core i5 8257U

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster