Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
CMP 170HX
+120%
12630
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
2304
Shading Units
4480
144
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA100
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A