Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+968%
5728
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2304
Shading Units
216
144
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT200B
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
