Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+109%
12000
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2304
Shading Units
2816
144
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD107
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7