Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (2010MHz vs 1250MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 56
8960
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+37%
12350
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1138 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
3584
Shading Units
3072
224
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
80.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
280.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
17.92 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
8.960 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
560.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
50W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
AD107
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7