Radeon R7 250 OEM vs GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 320W)
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2550MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
9856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
806
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
+6378%
52220
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2295 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
384
Shading Units
10240
24
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
320W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD103
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
