Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
+1215%
1894
FireGL V3600
144
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
3
1024
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
73W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV630
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
