Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro S7150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+52%
5733
FirePro S7150
3768
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
32
2816
Shading Units
2048
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Tonga
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
