Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+261%
5733
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
134W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
GK106
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1