Home Comparison Radeon R9 295X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

Radeon R9 295X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (450W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +328%
24580

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
2816
Shading Units
8192
176
TMUs
512
64
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
450W
900 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net