Home Comparison Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (375W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled +128%
13110

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1382 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
409.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.21 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.11 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
819.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
375W
900 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
Vega 10
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX LCS
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net