Home Comparison Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +1488%
91060

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Dec 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
2816
Shading Units
18176
176
TMUs
568
64
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
AD102
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net