Radeon R9 295X2 vs FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+1202%
5733
FireGL V8650
440
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
4
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
R600
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
