Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +727%
24720

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
58
1792
Shading Units
7424
112
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
110W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD104
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net