Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs FirePro M4000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+438%
3723
FirePro M4000
691
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
8
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
33W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Chelsea
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
