Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Mobility FireGL V5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+2184%
3723
Mobility FireGL V5725
163
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Crystal System
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
3
2048
Shading Units
120
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
M86
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL
(216-0683010)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
