Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVS 4200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+2286%
3723
NVS 4200M
156
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Crystal System
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GF119
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1