Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation +178%
10370

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.20 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.0 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.37 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.37 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
162.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net