Radeon X1650 GT vs Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
